Iowa Caucus tallied by Israeli Defense Firm
The Israeli Defense Company
That Tallies the Iowa Caucus Released by Christopher Bollyn on December 31st, 2007 at 8:10am
VOXEO
In the summer of 2004, I first learned that a foreign and out-of-state company using Interactive Voice Response (IVR) technology tallied the Iowa caucus results.
The system used to tally the 2004 Iowa caucus results was provided by a company called Voxeo, which was apparently based in Orlando, Florida. (Yellow flag goes up in the mind of those familiar with Orlando and electronic vote fraud history. See Bollyn article on Wang below.)
The calls from the nearly 2,000 caucus centers in Iowa went to a Voxeo call center in Atlanta, Georgia.
On January 31, 2005, I wrote to Michelle Bauer, Iowa’s Secretary of State with some questions about the use of Voxeo, a foreign company located in Florida, to tally the results of the Iowa caucus:
Subject: How was the Iowa Caucus Tallied?Dear Sirs,
When I visited the headquarters of the Democratic Party in Des Moines last summer, I learned that the tally of the Iowa caucus had been “out-sourced” to a company in Atlanta, Georgia.
What this means is that the tallying of the Iowa caucus results was done over the telephone, using the touch-tone buttons, to enter the results from each caucus location…
I am interested in how this was done, and why. Why did the Democratic Party allow the crucial tally of the caucus results to be done by a company in Atlanta? Don’t they trust their own math skills?
Can any of you provide any information about this matter?
Kind regards,
Christopher Bollyn
A person named Mike Milligan wrote back on behalf of Secretary of State Bauer:
Mike Milligan <milliganconsulting@mchsi.com> wrote:Dear Christopher:
The Secretary of State forwarded me the email you sent to then on Monday, January 31, 2004 [sic] regarding the Iowa Caucuses.
Unfortunately you either received some incorrect information in your travels or are confused. The Iowa Democratic Party completed all of the caucus night tabulations in Iowa, in the Des Moines/Polk County Convention Center, which was the Caucus night HQ. In fact, our tech staff wrote the software that tabulated the results.
To answer your second to last question, we feel we have a comfortable grasp of mathematics.
Sincerely,
MWM
Mike Milligan, Executive Director
Iowa Democratic Party
(515) 244-7292 ex. 676
I wrote this note back to Mr. Milligan:
Dear Mr. Milligan, I am responding to you about how the caucus results for the Iowa Democratic Party were tallied on the night of the nation’s first caucus. After checking my sources, I can assure you that it is correct that an out-of-state telephone/computer system tallied the Iowa precinct results.The system used was provided by Voxeo Corporation based in Orlando, Florida. The calls went from Iowa to a call center in Atlanta, Georgia.
This information was first provided to me last August by John McCormally, Communications Director for the Iowa Democratic Party in Des Moines, Iowa.
Today I called Voxeo (800) 305-5771 in Orlando and although I didn’t go into detail, the receptionist confirmed that Voxeo had conducted the telephone tally of the Iowa Democratic Caucus results.
How is it that you don’t know that?
McCormally told me that chairmen were selected in all 1,993 precincts and these chairmen called in on touch-tone phones and after giving their PIN number, were able to enter the results from their precinct using the touch-tone number pad.
I’m not going to go into great detail at this point, but this procedure of using an out-of-state computer company to tally the precinct results for the Iowa Democratic Caucus lacks the transparency and openness that one might expect in this exercise in grass-roots poll.
Clearly, if someone wanted to adjust the results, it would be the easiest thing to do to do it through this computer system in Orlando, Florida. The Democrats in Iowa would never be aware of it, regardless of their math skills, unless the paper results were carefully audited in an open and honest manner.
Christopher Bollyn
THE ISRAELIS & VOXEO
Now, who really is Voxeo, and why are the Iowa caucus results tallied by them? I don’t know if the 2008 Iowa results will be tallied in the same way, but I wouldn’t doubt it.
Voxeo is headed by Jonathan Taylor, who is the company’s President and CEO. This is what his Voxeo webpage says about him:
Jonathan combined his experience in both business operations and technology innovation to found Voxeo in 1999. Under his guidance, Voxeo has seen triple-digit revenue growth for four consecutive years and has been profitable since January, 2004. Prior to Voxeo, Jonathan founded and helped bring three additional software and infrastructure service companies to profitability. From 1995 to 1997, Jonathan was the founder and President of InterResearch and Development Group (IRdg), Inc. IRdg created and licensed iPost - the first internet powered OEM unified messaging solution - to leading telecommunications providers including Ericsson, Motorola and Unisys. IRdg was acquired by Elron Electronic Industries (Nasdq: ELRN) subsidiary MediaGate in 1997.
There you have it. Jonathan Taylor’s company, which he founded, was taken over by Elron Electronic Industries, the Israeli defense high tech company:
In its early days, Elron focused on defense, particularly electronics and avionics, as well as the emerging medical and technology sectors. In 1966, Elron founded Elbit, which combined the expertise of the Ministry of Defense-Research Institute in special computer design with Elron’s experience in electronic product design, manufacture and management.
Source: http://www.elron.net/default.asp?PageID=203
This is important information that Americans need to know and which they will not find in the Zionist-controlled media in the United States. It needs to be understood that the entire election process in the United States is a fraud. More than that, it is a fraud that is being perpetrated by the Israeli defense establishment on the naïve and gullible American public.
The sine qua non of an honest and transparent election process is the open counting of the votes by the voters themselves in each polling station in front of the open eyes of other citizens and members of the media. Any compromise in this most fundamental and essential process which acts to remove the citizenry from the vote-counting process simply cannot be accepted.
This is what Americans MUST get back to, in every polling station in the nation: paper ballots that are hand counted in front of the public.
Nothing else will do to protect their democratic franchise in the United States - NOTHING.
Christopher Bollyn is an independent journalist who needs the support of his readers. If you value his research and writing, please send a donation via PayPal to: bollyn@bollynbooks.com or shop@bollynbooks.com
Zionist media, blah blah blah. Another Jew hater.
Christopher,
Thats really screwed up. I understand outsourcing in other sectors, but politics?
Peope do not understand how important primaries are. Primaries and electoral college are the reason we say, One Republic, under God. Not one democracy. Why cant people see that? Its not a popular vote its a vote of parties and a vote in an early caucass such as Iowa has the potential to swing a vote in a states that vote later Its so cu, dry and simple. You need to make an article explaining why we are one republic under God. Its because of primaries and electoral. Dont get me wrong, I believe a republic has a purpose but damn, outsourcing to Israel. It reminds me of that Robbin williams movie where he got elected because of a crooked counting system company.
To Robert L:
This is nothing about Jew hating. The exact same reaction should occur if this were being handled by a British, a German, or a Canadian company. The fact that your votes are being counted by a company in another country, ANY country, should shock and disgust real Americans.
I have to admit, this concerns me. Foreign companies counting our votes? That not very reassuring to hear.
This article is a fraud. 1st, Michelle Bauer was not the Iowa SOS at the time, nor has she ever been. How does a real journalist mistake such a simple fact!?! Also, why would you start your letter to a MICHELLE with “Dear Sirs”? 2nd, you say that your initial letter was on January 31, 2005, but the response letter states January 31, 2004. I couldn’t read beyond that point b/c clearly this is garbage. The best part is that you included a picture of yourself and a plea for paypal donations.
It is sad to see that people no longer can think and argue logically. Disagreeing with the Zionism does not mean dislike or hate toward Jews. Similarly ,dislike for Israel is not equivalent to disliking Jews… that would be the same as saying dislike for Iran means to dislike Muslims.
Are You Serious:
“2nd, you say that your initial letter was on January 31, 2005, but the response letter states January 31, 2004[sic]”
You will notice that you omitted [sic]… do you know what [sic] means? Look it up…. you’ll learn something.
To Paul L.
No, this is about Jew hating. This article is implying that there is a conspiracy in the works in which Israel is rigging the Iowa primaries and it is being covered up by the “zionist media.” If it was simply about outsourcing, phrases such as “zionist media” would not be used. Christopher Bollyn obviously has an alternative agenda, and it is apparent from the tone of his article.
And just in case you are too lazy like the thousands of sheep in this country…
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source - Share This
sic /sik; Eng. s?k/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[seek; Eng. sik] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adverb Latin.
so; thus: usually written parenthetically to denote that a word, phrase, passage, etc., that may appear strange or incorrect has been written intentionally or has been quoted verbatim: He signed his name as e. e. cummings (sic).
But please don’t take my word for it… verify it yourself. The masses consume the news assuming it is fact and truth and never double check or verify it due to laziness and apathy. This is why the U.S. will fall. The people are apathetic and lazy and only two things happen to apathetic and lazy people: the die off, or they become servants to masters.
What do you need to put this information on fox or cnn or nbc or other national news???
While the author could have left out “zionist media”, you don’t have to be a Jew to be a Zionist.
to J:
“Anti-Zionism equals Anti-Semitism”
-Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
http://www.jewsnotzionists.org/differencejudzion.html
So, what your story says, is that in 2004 the votes were (apparently) counted by a voice response software company whose (American) founder once also founded a telecomm messaging company which he sold ten years ago to an Israeli high-tech outfit which has the Israeli defense department as one of its customers.
Boy, if that’s true, we are sure up shit creek, eh? those Jews!
What is wrong with people? Seriously.
The only link between the company who tallies the Democratic caucus votes and Israel, is that the CEO of Voxeo once sold one of his companies to an Israeli defense contractor.
Voxeo is not an Israeli Defense firm.
Please back-up and step away from that tinfoil hat, Sir.
Here in Knoxville Tennessee our votes are “counted” by foreign military contractor Danaher Systems, which loses 20,000 registered votes in Knox County each “election”. In 2007 (we vote in odd years to keep the sheeple from figuring out when to vote) the voting machines were literally exported out of state in order for the “broken” computers to be read and counted by a private subcontractor.
So your story in Iowa sounds just like the nightmare in TN. The Iowa “winners” were announded with only 30% of the votes “counted”. At 10pm CST, CNN’s webpage alleged 97% of votes were counted, but other totals reported only 30% to 40% were counted.
http://piratenews.org/iowa-caucus-votescam-10-20pm-cst.jpg
The man who is a pessimist before 48 knows too much; if he is an optimist after it, he knows too little.
[...] Iowa Caucus tallied by Israeli Defense Firm [...]