Twitter is for losers, why should “I” use it?
I still have a lot of people that I talk with on a daily basis that don’t get Twitter. They either think it’s for losers, find it confusing or just think it’s plain useless. Last night I had a conversation with a Social Media Buddy of mine who works for, let’s call it a well-known media company and we discussed Twitter, Digg and the possibilities of where social news networks and social media in general are headed.
Now you don’t see me flashing around titles and sales pitches calling myself a social media expert or any of that garbage. These are just my opinions that should have a little merit since I have spent a lot of my waking moments on social media websites writing and syndicating content through and around these networks.
In addition to that introduction, I know, the display of this information isn’t pretty. If you want something pretty, go to TechCrunch, Mashable or Engadget. I relate this to my feelings as I have done with SEO clients, it’s not always about being pretty, it’s about getting the job done and providing valuable information!
With all that said, enjoy the voyeuristic pleasure of being inside my conversation, sounds like Twitter huh? I censored out some private references, changed my Social Media Buddy’s name to SocialMediaBuddy, but I have left most everything else in tact. I hope this helps convey why some of you on the fence should probably start actively using Twitter.
(Quick note: Some of you may be scratching your heads when you read this. Please understand that this discussion of Twitter is really from a PR, Internet Marketing, content distribution & syndication viewpoint. Twitter is wonderful for many reasons, this is one niche.)
ENTER SOCIAL VOTE REQUEST CONVERSATION:
(Censored Reddit Title / Reddit Link)
SocialMediaBuddy: thanks for the help Joel
Joel: Gotcha man.
SocialMediaBuddy: thanks man
SocialMediaBuddy: hey Joel may I ask for some Diggs?
SocialMediaBuddy: okay
SocialMediaBuddy:
SocialMediaBuddy: all good
SocialMediaBuddy: ha
SocialMediaBuddy: wooooord
Joel: Nah, LOL, I just hustle it a different way, I let it either go or not. Using Twitter a LOT… probably too much.
SocialMediaBuddy: ah
Joel: Maybe, but I don’t RT stuff when ppl don’t RT my stuff, so the answer is actually no UNLESS I find it good personally and worthy of people’s eyeballs.
SocialMediaBuddy: ah cool
SocialMediaBuddy: wooord
SocialMediaBuddy: yeah I hear that
Joel: hehe, dang man… I totally have to agree. I had no clue they were making such an amazing Star Trek. …. by JJ Abrams. Damn!
SocialMediaBuddy: totally
(some private stuff censored here)
SocialMediaBuddy: yeah good point
SocialMediaBuddy: haha
Joel:
Here’s an article I wrote on the GOOG and Twitter a couple days ago…http://openpresswire.com/internet/birth-of-the-real-time-google-hybrid-twitter-search/
You don’t have to actually read it, but you might want to install the nifty little greasemonkey plugin.
SocialMediaBuddy: okay
SocialMediaBuddy: Levar Burton has 81,000 followers
SocialMediaBuddy: ha
Joel: Twitter levels the playing field. It brings equilibrium to the social media industry. It eliminates (for the most part) typical social media spam because it’s decided on a conscious decision whether you follow someone or not. If you can’t stand the person you don’t have to follow them. The true secret of Tweetdeck though, is that you can follow anyone and still filter them out.
SocialMediaBuddy: really?
Joel: Twitter frees information for all to see by removing stupid algorithms to decide, removing biased moderators to censor and allows the information to flow squarely on the merit of it’s true value.
SocialMediaBuddy: ahhhh
Joel: Well the big examples are what’s made Twitter get to the point it is at today. Plane crashes, car chases, fires and disasters… these all have been covered and reached “breaking” status touching thousands of ppl in only minutes where on social media sites, it takes at least 6 hours.
SocialMediaBuddy: ah
SocialMediaBuddy: HAHAHAH
Joel: That’s why a lot of social media addicts come to Twitter, however, Twitter will replace Digg without a doubt. Ends to a means. People come to promote their Digg stuff and then learn that Digg becomes old school when they see the instant exchange on Twitter. Digg will still have it’s place probably for the next few years but honestly…? It’s like an old stuffed animal in the attic.
SocialMediaBuddy: whoah
Joel: Twitter can feed Digg though. You can still get your pageviews from Digg but Twitter will be the stream of information that flows into Digg’s crappy algorithm, bias, censoring and power users.
SocialMediaBuddy: right
Joel: Let’s not jump to conclusions, I’m talking about a few years here. Digg is not disappearing, in the U.S. alone it still has 35.4 million unique views a month. Twitter itself only clocks in at 5.9 million unique views a month in the U.S. There is a major discrepancy here however. Twitter cannot be measured in the same context as an “old school” social media site because of it’s fantastic API and 3rd party products.
SocialMediaBuddy: tinyurl, etc.
Joel: Twitter doesn’t have a single frontpage. Twitter’s frontpage data is aggregated from hundreds of sources using hashtags, keywords, retweet statistics, power user mentions and link and source rankers. I haven’t come up with an accurate way to calculate Twitter’s reach yet… I’m sure at this point only Evan knows this information which is why he is so tickled when ppl ask about his business model and competition from other sites like Facebook.
SocialMediaBuddy: yeah
Joel: My point is this, people often steal tweets on Twitter. If you have a great one, they will take your source link, remake a new link (another shortener etc) and Tweet it as their own or they’ll go to another social media site like Reddit, Digg, StumbleUpon, Mixx (you get the point)… then they submit or broadcast… but if you’re the source of information… all their theft is doing is promoting the source. So in this thought, unique content rules in the viral distribution model.
SocialMediaBuddy: AHHHHH
Joel: Facebook is making wonderful changes. They’re just proving that Twitter’s model is the future. Duplicating a business model is the best compliment one can have.
SocialMediaBuddy: ah
Joel: Twitter has developed into quite the international sensation too though. It’s just a horse race at this point. In terms of users Facebook is winning… but really the sites are just too different to compare. Twitter is more sleek and lean at information transmission, Facebook is a big social smorgasbord. Twitter really just compliments Facebook or enhances it. It would be in Facebook’s best interest to adopt Twitter into their model or try again to buy them with Microsoft’s money.
SocialMediaBuddy: hahaha
Joel: A good cover on how Facebook failed to buy Twitter can be found here: http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/mar2009/tc2009031_743025.htm
SocialMediaBuddy:
SocialMediaBuddy: OH wait – before you go….
SocialMediaBuddy: (yet)
Joel: Business intelligence, brand protection / promotion, brand surveillance and contextual sponsored integration (stealing from Google’s model with a most likely innovative twist).
[...] : eyes-on originally appeared on Engadget on Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:06:00 EST. Please see our terms Twitter is for losers, why should “I” use it? – openpresswire.com 03/06/2009 I still have a lot of people that I talk with on a daily basis that [...]
“the star trek trailer gave me a hard-on”
This article was to disprove that Twitter was for losers correct? hahaha! maybe you should have edited out that part too my friend…
I can’t say I truly agree with the ideas here. Twitter is a niche product for web-addicts that rarely leave cyberspace and see little reason to leave it. If you get on facebook as an example and their new adoption of the twitter format, you can see the massive distaste for the change to this new format.
You may be right, but I think the general consensus on twitter is that it’s mostly useless unless you’re a web-addict who needs to promote things in order to drive traffic… in effect, it may become a social media circle-jerk for lack of a better term. I think of old-fashioned link exchanges when I read your conversation… I don’t find it very forward thinking, I find it somewhat retro. A new paint job on an old idea.
Hi Run,
Thanks for your comment on the blog post. I do find it a little comical that you suggest I should have censored or edited part of the conversation. Maybe you do that crap on your blog, but here in my zone, I expose people that pull that kind of stuff.
I’m finding it really hard to believe you hardly know what Twitter is from that statements that you make. Twitter is a niche product? 1,380% growth in one month is not niche, neither is mainstream adoption. Whether the mainstreaming of Twitter is a good idea or not could be debated but the fact that it is going mainstream is not debatable.
You are 100% correct that the Facebook theft of trying to be Twitter is completely horrible. Facebook has lost their voice for the time being and will realize people were on Facebook for a more diverse type of social networking. This has no bearing on the success of Twitter or whether it’s useful or not.
Please pull your head out of the sand and quit using your opinions as, “general consensus.” If you would just read the news or look at the traffic numbers you’ll see you’re sadly mistaken. Whether you find me forward thinking or not, I don’t really care, I’m just bearing to all my ideas and thoughts of the movement of social media.
With all that said, thanks for stopping by and giving us all a laugh. I love counter-idea and you and I would clearly have them all day long.
I agree with RUN. Twitter is a mile wide and 1 inch deep. 10% of its users produce 90% of the posts. Its digital diarrhea of the mouth.
SocialMediaBuddy: hey Joel may I ask for some Diggs?
Joel: F*** no, I hate digg.
SocialMediaBuddy: HAHAHAH
but you looouuuve me
Oh My God. You are a winner. Wow what an in-depth conversation. I didnt waste my life reading most of it, because its useless. I found your web hog page by Googling ” I hate Twitter” Because I hate people who believe that “social media” is social at all. It is not. Nor are you. GO OUTSIDE
Oh My God. You are a winner.
now i know what twats do instead of anything useful with their lives. thanks for the insight.